Flagship platform · AutonomeX

An execution layer between communication and the systems that run the business

Email in. Finished work out.

InboxOS reconstructs the business situation behind incoming communication and turns it into structured, prioritised work. You choose which low-risk workflows auto-queue; uncertain and high-impact work stays with people.

InboxOS · request detail Human review on
InboxOS operator decision on the offline fictional demo: evidence for a draft bill of lading approval, the next action, and send held in this demo.
Request detail · offline demo · fictional records
One email. Four controlled stages.

Fast enough for operators. Clear enough for review.

  1. IntakeEmail + documents
  2. UnderstandRequest type + fields
  3. RoutedPriority + risk
  4. ApprovedA person sends

The product

See the work
as the queue sees it.

Real views of the product. The screens below the product demo are the current product on fictional logistics records. A hosted demo on the same records is available by invitation.

Product demo · 2 min 20 s

One journey through the product, recorded on an earlier build, from an email arriving to a situation held for a person's decision. Its labels, pipeline strip and send step have since changed; sending is disabled in the offline demo. Request demo access to try it on fictional records, by invitation.

InboxOS Autonomous-eligible list on the offline fictional demo: three open requests, with the line that no action has been executed.
InboxOS operator decision on the offline fictional demo: evidence for a draft bill of lading approval beside the next action. Send is held in this demo.
InboxOS full trace on the offline fictional demo for one request: five authored stages, the last marked Awaiting review and human authority, plus what the pipeline did not record. These stages were written for the demo, not produced by a live run.
Human review on

See what needs attention

One queue, already sorted.

Open requests are ordered by attention, with priority and risk from the pack. Shown here is the Autonomous-eligible lens, sorted by time left against ERT: requests the routing rules made eligible, with no action executed.

  • SignalWhat · urgency · care
  • StatusReview state visible
  • TeamShared operations work

Open the work

Context gathered. Draft waiting.

Evidence and the next action sit together. On this offline demo the draft is review-ready and send stays disabled. A person still decides what leaves.

  • Multi-askAsks stay visible
  • EditBefore you send
  • EvidenceWith the work

Explain what happened

A path you can look back on.

When operations, auditors or a handover asks why, the record is already there: each recorded stage and its note, and what was not recorded.

  • HistoryWhat was recorded
  • ChecksTraining · audit
  • TrustShow the path

The idea

A chatbot helps a person answer email. InboxOS helps an organisation finish the work the email is about.

Email is the front door. Completed work is the product. That is controlled autonomy: you decide which workflows may advance automatically, while every external reply stays under your authority.

Before and after

Same blocked shipment.
A different day for the team.

The unit of work is the business situation, not the message. One operational exception, shown here on a logistics example: buried in the shared inbox before, raised as work with a draft waiting for a person after.

Operators start from what needs action and what is due; supervisors from overdue, blocked and unassigned work; leaders from exceptions and service position against ERT on Overview.

Before

Shared inbox

Urgent work looks like every other message.

  • Hold sits beside routine mail
  • Context stays in the thread
  • Someone has to dig before acting
With InboxOS

Work queue

The same hold rises as owned work.

  • Exception rises with priority and risk
  • Fields and draft wait together
  • Authority stays with your team

Attention where it counts

Start from the work.
Organise the mail.

InboxOS starts from the work a request actually is. The queue orders what needs a person. Situations group related requests. It does not file mail into Action, Awareness or Ignore.

Work

What needs a person

The work queue orders open requests by attention: blocked work, what is overdue against its expected resolution time, and what is waiting. Which fields matter is configured for the operation.

Situations

Related requests, one view

Requests that share a business reference can be read together. InboxOS does not keep a separate view that drops spam, promotions or duplicates out of the queue.

By role

Matched to responsibilities

  • Operators see what needs a person, what is waiting and what is due soon.
  • Supervisors see overdue, blocked and unassigned work.
  • Leaders see exceptions, service position against ERT and automation eligibility in the Overview executive summary.

Operational evidence

Not one screen.
An operating model.

The same product read as an operating model: four unedited captures in the order work moves, each cropped to the part that matters, including where the product says it has no authority or did not record something.

InboxOS · operational situations Grouped by reference
InboxOS Situations on the offline fictional demo: three situations grouped by booking reference, with the work involved, attention reasons, and what is blocked or overdue.

Cropped for a small screen: the work involved, attention reasons and latest email for each situation.

What it is really about

Requests that share a booking reference are shown as one situation. This offline demo shows three. The view names the work involved, why it has attention, and what is blocked or overdue. InboxOS groups them in view; it does not persist a case object today.

InboxOS · request detail Human review required
InboxOS operator decision on the offline fictional demo: evidence beside the next action for a draft bill of lading approval. Send is held in this demo.

Cropped for a small screen: the operator decision, including the next action.

What was understood

The operator decision for this offline-demo request: evidence on one side, the next action on the other. Send stays disabled here because the demo does not deliver mail. This frame is not a seven-stage record.

InboxOS · autonomous-eligible Eligibility lens
InboxOS Autonomous-eligible list on the offline fictional demo: three open requests. The page states that no action has been executed.

Cropped for a small screen: the three Autonomous-eligible requests, with their work types and time left against ERT.

What it may do

Requests eligible for the autonomous route under the configured decision rules. This offline demo states the boundary in the product: no action has been executed. Eligibility does not send a reply.

InboxOS · processing record Recorded stages
InboxOS full trace on the offline fictional demo for one request: five authored stages, the last marked Awaiting review and human authority, plus what the pipeline did not record. These stages were written for the demo, not produced by a live run.

Cropped for a small screen: this request's full trace. It shows five authored stages and says authority passes to an operator.

What was recorded

This capture is one offline-demo request, not every request. It shows five authored stages, the last marked Awaiting review and human authority. The record says authority passes to an operator, and it lists what the pipeline did not record. The stages were written for the demo. A live run can record a different number.

Where InboxOS sits

InboxOS has no shipped connector into a TMS, ERP or CRM: nothing has been read from or written to them. In the offline demo, sending is disabled; a drafted reply waits for a person.

Same platform. Your operation's language.

Same core, different vocabulary: request types, the facts that matter and which workflows are in scope live in your industry pack, outside the operating core. Run another email-heavy operation? Tell us your inbox and we will say whether it fits now or later.

Expected Resolution Target

Read the pressure
before you read the thread.

ERT is the expected resolution target configured for each request type: a decision aid, not a service level agreement unless you contract it as one. The instrument below is the one the product renders.

Booking amendment · resolution target 4h

3h 0m left

Within ERT

Under half the configured resolution target has elapsed.

Time elapsed

Six colour bands across three operational states. Step through them, or read the whole ramp below.

  1. Within targetUnder half the window has gone
  2. ApproachingMore than half the window has gone, not yet at the target
  3. Near deadlineClose to the target, not past it
  4. OverduePast the target, and by how much
  5. Well overdueWell past the configured target
  6. 2x ERT or morePast the presentation mark. Nothing is escalated

Blocked is a different problem

When a required field or document is still missing, the work is blocked on missing information. That is not a clock problem, and chasing the customer harder does not resolve it. InboxOS separates the two so an operator can tell a deadline from a dependency.

Blocked is not late. When a required field or document is still missing, the work waits on information, not on the clock.

Eligibility is not action

2x ERT or more means elapsed time has reached twice the expected resolution target. Nothing is escalated: no reassignment, notification or send fires from the clock. The 2x mark is a presentation default, not a pack setting.

Nothing is escalated. 2x ERT or more is a clock reading. No reassignment, notification or send fires from it.

You decide what urgent means

The target comes from the request type in your industry pack, and required fields and priority are configured there too. Where one message carries several requests, the shortest active target is the one shown. Prioritisation is configurable and governed, never an opaque score you cannot question.

The target comes from your pack, not from us. Priority is configurable and governed, never an opaque score you cannot question.

What changes

A better day
for the team.

Four outcomes on the desk, each one something you can see in the product.

Operating visibility

Request type, missing information, risk and owner sit with each piece of work. Work that fits no configured request type stays visible for review instead of disappearing.

Exceptions first

Exceptions, missing documents and time-critical requests rise first, showing who owns each one, or that nobody does yet, and the next action.

Judgment on the real decision

Extracted fields, the one still missing, the evidence behind them and a ready-to-review reply sit together, so judgment goes where it matters. When one message carries more than one ask, each ask stays visible as work.

Control you can show

Edit the draft; a person with authority sends. The record keeps each recorded stage and its note, and what was not recorded.

Discovery grounds the labour range in your sample. Service, risk and control outcomes are judged in pilot evidence, not a second invented score.

Not available today: verified-sender protection, stronger live-mailbox conversation continuity and a scheduled review loop for unclassified work. What is shipped and what is not

The hosted demo runs on fictional logistics records, by invitation. Request demo access

Why InboxOS

Built for finished
work.

Others help you write faster. InboxOS helps the organisation complete the job the message represents, with your people still in charge.

How it compares with AI responders, inbox AI, shared inboxes, helpdesks and DIY automation

AI email responders

Usual fit

Fast drafts from a prompt or a short summary of the thread.

InboxOS

Clear work: what the email is about, what is missing, how urgent it is, and a draft waiting for a person to approve.

Inbox AI assistants

Usual fit

Personal help inside the inbox you already use every day.

InboxOS

A work queue that sits beside your team's connected mailbox. Urgent exceptions rise as owned work with priority, risk and review state.

Shared inbox tools

Usual fit

Team sorting of conversations and who owns the reply.

InboxOS

The words your teams already use, the exceptions that are genuinely time-critical, and a path you can look back on when someone asks why.

Helpdesk tools

Usual fit

Support tickets sorted into a general‑purpose taxonomy.

InboxOS

Operational work sorted into the request types your industry pack defines, with a person approving every send.

Build-it-yourself automation

Usual fit

Connecting tools with rules someone has to build and keep running.

InboxOS

It already understands the operational work your industry pack describes, with people still in the path when commitment is made.

Buyer’s field guide

Four tools. Four different jobs.

Use the category that matches the work you need to change. InboxOS is for operational email that must become owned, reviewable work.

Side by side: four tools, four jobs
What matters Shared inbox Helpdesk Chatbot / agent InboxOS
Primary job Assign conversations Manage support tickets Answer or draft Finish operational work
Understands your operational work Manual setup General‑purpose taxonomy Prompt dependent Built into the workflow
Missing fields + risk Team checks Rules and forms Varies by prompt Surfaced with the ticket
Approval before send Possible Possible Not the control plane Required by design
Reconstructable path Conversation history Ticket history Model transcript Work + review trail
Size the labour range for your own desk Optional capacity estimator · released hours only, never cash saved or headcount cut

One measurable slice

Labour hours are the easy number. The operating case is larger.

Use the calculator for released capacity only. The fuller return is the four outcomes above: operating visibility, exceptions first, judgment on the real decision and control you can show.

Labour proxy This only prices desk hours × your hourly cost. Released capacity is not cash saved or headcount cut unless you choose that path. Faster service, lower risk and stronger control are real, but not in this number. Team volume Monthly mail = people × emails per day × 22 working days. HITL review kept Every customer reply still needs a person. Automated actionable mail keeps 1.5 minutes of residual review in the after-state. Conservative to upside Three planning cases from cautious to optimistic. In each case we only count 50 to 60% of the theoretical time save as adopted. A range to plan with, not a guarantee. Grade C until Discovery Built from the numbers you type here. Discovery later checks them against a sample of your real mail, which raises the evidence grade.
01
Your team Team, volume and handle time
Start from
How many people handle the ops inbox on a normal day. Month volume = people × emails per day × 22 working days.
Average messages one person handles in a day, across all three buckets. Month = people × this × 22 working days. 40
Time for real work mail only: you set this. Awareness is fixed at 45 seconds and noise at 10 seconds. Automated actionable still keeps 1.5 minutes of residual review. 8 min
02
Work mix You choose how much mail is actionable. Of the rest, we assume 60% is awareness and 40% is noise. How much mail is real work
Mail that needs a reply or a system update. Whatever is left is split 60% awareness / 40% noise. 55%
  • 55% Actionable Work that moves the shipment or the customer: bookings, holds, documents. Time comes from your minutes slider.
  • 27% Awareness Status updates and FYIs you skim. We assume 45 seconds each.
  • 18% Noise Mail you mostly ignore. We assume 10 seconds each. Savings from noise never exceed 15% of total released hours.

Assumed: awareness 45s · noise 10s · rest split 60/40 · review 1.5m on automated actionable · month = 22 days · FTE ÷ 160 · realisation 50 to 60% · noise ≤15% of released hours

03
Landed cost What one ops hour costs the company: pay, benefits and overhead. Released hours × this rate becomes the labour value. Loaded ops hour for your geography
Same rate as above. Annual labour value = released hours per month × 12 × this hourly cost. Currency follows the selector on this step. ₹300

Default ~India mid-market loaded ops hour. Raise for higher-cost geos.

Rates indicative · not a quote

Out
What you could get back We compare today’s hours with hours after automation (keeping 1.5 minutes review on automated actionable), then keep only 50 to 60% as realistically adopted. Month = 22 working days. Year ×12. One FTE-month = 160 hours. On your inputs

Expected on your inputs The middle of three planning cases. Released hours per month after automation and residual review, counting 55% of the theoretical time save as adopted. FTE = hours ÷ 160. Value = hours × 12 × your landed hourly cost, before platform fees.

-

~- FTE of capacity · - labour value

Conservative to upside: - h / month · - FTE · -

A labour proxy from your inputs: released capacity, not cash saved or headcount cut. Before platform fees. Indicative, evidence grade C until Discovery.

Why labour is one lens, not the whole case

How this is built: today, released, and three planning cases
Today Desk hours this month before InboxOS: volume × time per bucket. Volume = people × emails per day × 22 working days. - - -
Released / month Hours freed each month after automation and residual review, then reduced for realistic adoption: 50%, 55% or 60% by scenario. Year = ×12. - - h / year
Conservative Cautious case: about 55% of actionable, 70% of awareness and 80% of noise automated. Automated actionable keeps 1.5 minutes review. We count 50% of the theoretical time save. - -
Expected Mid case: about 65% actionable, 82% awareness and 90% noise automated. Automated actionable keeps 1.5 minutes review. We count 55%. - -
Upside Optimistic case: about 72% actionable, 90% awareness and 95% noise automated. Automated actionable keeps 1.5 minutes review. We count 60%. A ceiling for planning, not a commitment. - -

Trust

Where your data stays.
Who stays in control.

One organisation. One dedicated setup. The private demo stays separate and uses fictional offline records.

AI acts. Humans stay in control.

Questions buyers ask first

Deeper evaluator questions are answered on the Security & Control page: default thresholds, priority rules, audit trail, approval rights and certification posture.

Will AI write to customers without us?

No. In the current product, a person approves every reply that reaches a customer before it sends.

Can we choose how much is automated?

Yes. You set the autonomy dial. You choose which workflows are eligible and the confidence and risk thresholds. Routine low-risk work can auto-queue into the Autonomous Queue, where it stays visible and supervised; uncertain and high-impact work stays in human review.

Can Autonomous Queue be switched off?

Yes. Autonomous Queue is optional. It is controlled in your industry pack, where eligibility is decided per request type: under the default rule (confidence at least 7 and low request-type risk), a pack with no request type marked low risk leaves nothing for the queue to hold. Classification, extraction, drafting and human approval before send remain available.

Will our mail sit with other companies?

No. One organisation, one dedicated setup. Your deployment is single-tenant and dedicated to your company.

Do we hand over the live inbox to see it?

No. You start with fictional records, then a past-mail sample. The hosted demo uses fictional offline records for invited people. Discovery uses a past-mail sample you choose, and your live password stays with you.

How hard is it to start, and can we change the rules later?

Start light, then grow on the same core. There is no hard cutover. Your industry pack carries how work is judged; as evidence builds, we refine it with you and open more workflow types without replacing InboxOS.

How you buy

Where data stays

Your organisation.
Your own setup.

  • Single tenantOne setup per organisation
  • Your placeInbox and history you control
  • Private demoFictional records · invited only
  • DiscoveryPast sample · password stays yours
  • SecurityContract-specific claims

Configurable autonomy

You decide how far
each workflow can go.

Human Open ≥ 7 low risk default
  • WorkflowsYou choose eligibility
  • OptionalSet per request type in your pack
  • SendApproved under roles you control

Documents

Share the detail
internally.

Briefs for security and leadership reviewers, on request with your demo note. The Security Overview is shared under NDA.

  • PDF · under NDA Security Overview Where work runs, what stays under your control, and stated limits. Request
  • PDF · on request Capability Register What InboxOS can do today, with clear boundaries. Request
  • PDF · on request Executive Decision Edition A short brief for leaders deciding whether to engage. Request
  • Insights · 5 notes Notes for operators who still live in email Operations teams, governed automation and capacity sizing without inflated ROI. Open all Insights

From the founder

Built for trust
at the moment of action.

AI that writes is becoming common. Trusted action is still rare. InboxOS exists so operations teams can move faster without giving up the judgment that protects customers and the company.

Banking data · Enterprise controls. Banking, compliance and consulting shaped the insistence on approval boundaries, traceability and explainable operations.

01

Banking data

Turning complex information into decisions.

Large-scale customer and transaction work made one lesson clear: intelligence matters only when people can act on it responsibly.

02

Enterprise controls

Working where evidence and accountability matter.

Banking, compliance and consulting shaped the insistence on approval boundaries, traceability and explainable operations.

03

AI systems

Designing for trusted execution, not novelty.

InboxOS brings workflow intelligence, agent orchestration and human judgment together at the moment work moves.

Begin

A clear path.
Evidence at every step.

Size the work on your own sample, prove one workflow with its autonomy and review boundaries, then grow the industry pack on the same core.

How you buy

  1. 01

    See InboxOS

    This page and a private demo on fictional records.

    Your data None. The demo uses fictional offline records.

  2. 02

    Discovery

    A past-mail sample you choose plus your labour costs, with no hard cutover. You see what is really in the inbox and get a labour range and an operating case.

    Your data Historical sample you choose. Live password stays with you.

    Start Fit Check intake
  3. 03

    Pilot

    One type of work, locked for the trial. Review boundaries stay under your control.

    Your data Real inbox you allow, after a safe test first.

  4. 04

    Annual

    Ongoing use when the team is ready. The industry pack grows with new request types and fields, without replacing InboxOS.

    Your data Your own private setup we run for you.

Discovery sizes the labour range on your sample. Service, risk and control outcomes are judged in pilot evidence. Fees follow that conversation.

First step

Request access. Get a walkthrough.

No live inbox. No deck-first pitch. The hosted demo runs on fictional logistics records; tell us your operation if you work outside freight.

  • Hosted demo on fictional records
  • Walkthrough of the review path
  • Your company alone when you go live

Hosted demo

Request demo access.

Reviewed by a person

A person reviews every request. We use your details only to send access and schedule a walkthrough. Typical reply: 1 business day.